Faculty

Kyle Khellaf

Assistant Professor, Comparative Literature, Classics

Ph.D. in Classical Philology, Yale University, 2018
M.A. in Classical Languages and Literatures, University of Georgia, 2012
B.A. (Hons.) in Latin and Ancient History, Swarthmore College, 2008

Email: kyle.khellaf@ucr.edu

Kyle Khellaf is Assistant Professor of Comparative Literature and Classics. His research focuses primarily on Greco-Roman historiography, and explores how ancient historical accounts and their non-linear teleologies emerged in response to broader historical phenomena. His current book project, The Paratextual Past: Digression in Classical Historiography, examines how digressions played a central role in the development of historiography and were eventually recognized as a historical tradition in their own right. It also explores the ways in which these embedded narratives open up histories and the canonical events they depict to a range of dialogic perspectives in the wake of imperial expansion and its complications. These include ethnographic encounters with foreign peoples; accounts of migration, transculturation, and settlement across the broader Mediterranean landscape; the liminal “Middle Sea,” with its numerous histories of colonization and the resulting paradoxographical encounters that unfold in its fluid spaces; as well as stories of slave rebellions and their leaders whose voices, were it not for the digression, would remain eclipsed by the “great men” of history.

Kyle’s other research and teaching interests include Greek and Roman poetry (especially Latin elegy and Greek epinician), ancient and modern empires, the problematic legacies of classical receptions (particularly in the colonial and postcolonial Maghreb), and the applications of Postwar French theory to the classical world.

Articles and Book Chapters:

“Migration and Mobile Memory in the Roman Historical Digression.” In Usages of the Past in Roman Historiography. Ed. Aske Damtoft Poulsen and Arne Jönssen (Forthcoming, 2020).

“The Elegiac Revolution: Deleuze, Desire, and Propertius’ Monobiblos.” In Psychology and the Classics: A Dialogue of Disciplines. Ed. Jeroen Lauwers, Hedwig Schwall , and Jan Opsomer. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter (July 2018), 171-88 Berlin and New York: Walter De Gruyter, 2018. 171-88.

“Incomplete and Disconnected: Polybius, Digression, and Its Historiographical Afterlife.” In Polybius and His Legacy. Ed. Nikos Miltsios and Melina Tamiolaki.  Berlin and New York: Walter De Gruyter, 2018. 167-201.

Encyclopedia Entries:

Six entries on “Battle of Mons Graupius,” “Brigantes,” “Calgacus,” “digressions,” “Ostorius Scapula,” and “Usipi.” In The Tacitus Encyclopedia. Ed. Victoria E. Pagan. Chichester, Malden, and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell (Forthcoming, 2020).

Book Reviews:

Review of Galtier, Fabrice. L’Image tragique de l’Histoire chez Tacite: Étude des schèmes tragiques dans les Histories et les Annales. Brussels: Collection Latomus, 2011. In Classical Review 64 (2014): 151-53.